Baker v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Diego et al
| Michele Baker |
| Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Diego, Cathedral Catholic High School and Does 1 through 100, Inclusive |
| 3:2014cv00800 |
| April 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Jeffrey T. Miller |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 pr Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER granting 82 Motion to Dismiss. Action dismissed with prejudice in itsentirety, with each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 5/24/2018. (gac)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER Granting 51 Motion for Summary Judgment In Favor of Defendants and Against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 6/23/2016. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER Granting in part Defendants' 46 Ex Parte Application to Continue Expert Discovery Deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 4/5/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 23 Motion to Dismiss; denying 24 Motion to Strike; Denying Leave to Amend. The Court Denies the motion to dismiss the disability discrimination claim, Grants the motion to dismiss the wrongful termination claim, Grants the motion to dismiss the declaratory relief claim, Denies the motion to strike and Denies Plaintiff leave to amend. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 3/23/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 15 Motion to Dismiss; Granting Leave to Amend. The court concludes that the First Amended Complaint fails to adequately allege that Plaintiff is disabled for purposes of the ADA. Consequently, Plaintiff fails to state a claim for e ither ADA discrimination, retaliation, or wrongful termination and the court dismisses all claims. The court also grants Plaintiff 21 days' leave to amend from the date of entry of this order to file a Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"). Plaintiff is also advised that the failure to state a claim in the SAC may result in the dismissal of the SAC with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 12/17/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Granting 6 Motion to Dismiss; Granting Leave to Amend In Part. The court grants the motion to dismiss the FEHA claims with prejudice, grants the motion to dismiss all other claims without prejudice, and grants Plaintiff 15 days leave to amend the complaint from the date of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 8/26/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
