Shutterstock, Inc. v. Pikulski et al
| Shutterstock, Inc. |
| Norbert Pikulski and DOES 1-10 |
| 3:2014cv00869 |
| April 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER: Plaintiff Shutterstock, Inc.'s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Doc. 16 ) is granted. Plaintiff is entitled to default judgment against Defendant Norbert Pikulski as to all claims in the Complaint. Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as follows: 1. An award of $23,500.00 in statutory damages; 2. Transfer of domain names shutterst9ck.com, shjtterstock.com, ehutterstock.com, zhutterstock.com, whutterstock.com, shutterstpck.com, sh7tterstock.com, and shutterst0ck.com; 3. And an award of $14,392.00 in attorneys' fees and costs. No later than fourteen (14) days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff shall file a proposed judgment in accordance with the rulings in this Order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/19/2014. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause as to Why Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue (Doc. 5 ) is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 5/22/2014. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
