Crossfit, Inc. v. National Strength and Conditioning Association
| Crossfit, Inc. |
| National Strength and Conditioning Association |
| 3:2014cv01191 |
| May 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Karen S. Crawford |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
431
ORDER Approving 430 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice. All claims in the above-captioned action asserted by CrossFit against NSCA are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court SHALL CLOSE the file. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/8/2021. (tcf)
|
|
Filing
416
ORDER granting 415 Joint Motion for an Order approving the payment plan for National Strength and Conditioning Association to pay remaining balance of monetary sanctions. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/15/2020. (jpp)
|
|
Filing
394
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 326 and 359 Plaintiff CrossFit, Inc's renewed motion for terminating sanction.. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 12/04/2019. (jpp)
|
|
Filing
252
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's 215 Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order to Allow Additional Expert Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 7/18/2018. (mpl)
|
|
Filing
231
ORDER Denying 229 Motion to File Documents Under Seal. The Court denies without prejudice Plaintiffs Motion and grants Plaintiff leave to amend its motion to file documents under seal. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/7/2018. (mpl)
|
|
Filing
212
ORDER denying 186 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/19/2017. (mpl)
|
|
Filing
176
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part Motion for Sanctions (ECF Nos. 150, 162). Given the Court's ruling regarding the instant Sanctions Motion, and that the issues presented in the Supplemental Motion overlap those presented in the ins tant Sanctions Motion, the Court denies as moot the 174 Supplemental Motion. It is ordered that the Court grants Plaintiff's sanctions Motion as set forth above and denies without prejudice Plaintiff's Sanctions Motion regarding terminating sanctions. All specified deadlines shall be calculated from the date on which this Order is electronically docketed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/26/2017. (dxj)
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER (1) Denying 126 Motion for Certificate of Interlocutory Appeal, And (2) Denying as Moot 126 Motion to Stay. It is ordered that the Court concludes that defendant has not sufficiently established that this case is one of the few " ;exceptional" ones that warrants certifying an interlocutory appeal. Accordingly, the Court denies defendant's motion for interlocutory appeal, and denies as moot defendant's motion to stay. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/3/2017. (dxj)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER RE RENEWED JOINT MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF DISCOVERY DISPUTE (PUBLISHING AGREEMENTS); PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND ORDER QUASHING, IN PART, SUBPOENA SERVED ON THIRD PARTY LWW [Doc. No. 104] Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 10/7/2016. (plh)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER (1) granting Crossfit, Inc.'s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting in part and denying in part 102 National Strength and Conditioning Association's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/21/2016. (kcm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
