Garcia v. Sleeley et al
| Ruben Dario Garcia, Jr |
| Sleeley, A. Canlas, Martinez, Velardi, R. Clarke, Newton, A. Dembela, Jodie Rivera, M. Glynn, R. Cobb, R. Olson, J. Ramirez and Jhon/Jane Does 13-20 |
| 3:2014cv01525 |
| June 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Kings |
| Peter C. Lewis |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
201
ORDER granting 189 Plaintiff's motion for review of costs. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/13/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
|
Filing
196
ORDER denying without prejudice 195 Plaintiff's second exparte application for copies. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/27/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
|
Filing
178
ORDER: (1) Overruling Plaintiff's objections, (2) Adopting Report and Recommendation, and (3) Granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/19/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER denying 162 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of denial for extension of time to file second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/30/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
|
Filing
173
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 168 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro on 5/22/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER: (1) Overruling in part Plaintiff's objections, (2) Adopting in part report and recommendation, (3) Denying Plaintiff's motion for an order directing service, (4) Denying motion to dismiss for improper venue and misjoinder, and (5) Gr anting in part and denying in part Defendants' motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (ECF Nos. 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 . Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the electronic docketing of this Order. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/22/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 113 Motion In Limine without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter C. Lewis on 6/28/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER Dismissing All Unserved Defendants Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/17/2018. L. Meritt (Medical Service Provider), R. Scharffenberg (Medical Doctor), I. Sedighi (Medical Provider), L. Sheppard (Medical Services P rovider), Velardi (Medical Doctor or R.N.), P. Velardi (Medical Services Provider), R. Walker (Medical Doctor), E. Worman, Martinez (Medical Doctor) and M. Martinez (Medical Doctor) terminated. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER for Plaintiff to Serve First Amended Complaint on All Unserved Defendants re 43 Amended Complaint. The Court orders Plaintiff to arrange for service by the United States Marshal's Office on the unserved Defendants. If these defendant s are not served within 30 days of the date on which this Order is electronically docketed, the Court will dismiss them without prejudice in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/27/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
