Garcia v. Miller et al
| William Garcia |
| Amy Miller, L. Caldaron, R. Arias, R. Johnson, J. Velasquez, V. Cortez, D. Webb, R. Boas and F. Sandoval |
| 3:2014cv02266 |
| September 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER Adopting 34 Report and Recommendation Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court adopts the R&R. The Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket no. 25) is granted. Garcias motion for preliminary judgement (Docket no. 32) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 10/1/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 26 Ex Parte Application to Stay Discovery. Discovery regarding topics unrelated to the exhaustion of administrative remedies is STAYED. If Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied, the stay shall be lifted and discovery shall proceed in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil procedure. The Court may adjust the deadlines set forth in the current Scheduling Order, if necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 5/6/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
