Smith v. Cobb et al
| Gregory Smith |
| R. Cobb, Sharpe, A. Clark, J. Carey and E. Solis |
| 3:2015cv00176 |
| January 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gonzalo P. Curiel |
| William V. Gallo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER granting Summary Judgment in Favor of Defendants Sharpe and Cobb; dismissing without prejudice Claims Against Defendants Daroglou and Perez; denying as moot 82 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close the case. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/28/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER Regarding Summary Judgment Notice. The Court orders Plaintiff to respond to the Court on two issues. Plaintiff's response to both issues shall be filed no later than 21 days after the date this order is issued. Failure to respond properly may result in the dismissal of the remaining claims in this action. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/2/18.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER Granting 62 Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying as Moot 79 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendants Cobb and Sharpe on Plaintiff's access to court claim to the extent tha t it is premised on his inability to pursue a failure to protect claim. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendant Beduhi on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim. Summary judgment is denied as to Plaintiff's access to courts claim t o the extent it is premised on his inability to file a claim for his "lost property." Within 21 days of this order, Plaintiff shall submit evidence that would preclude summary judgment on this basis. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/23/17. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's 50 Motion to Strike and Adopting 58 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/5/17. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
58
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re Plaintiff's 50 MOTION to Strike Answer. No later than June 30, 2017, any party to this action may file written objections with the Court. Any reply to the objections shall be filed with the Court and served on all parties no later than July 13, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 5/30/17.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice 55 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 1/17/17. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 42 Report and Recommendation Denying Defendants' 24 Motion for Summary Judgment and 25 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. The Court DENIES Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of exhaustion and GRANTS Summary Judgment sua sponte to Plaintiff on the issue of exhaustion. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/29/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Granting 6 Motion for Leave to Substitute Defendants; and Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of First Amended Complaint. Defendants Daroglou, Prez and Buduhi have been added to the Court's docket. Plaintiff's "Motion for Leave to File an Amended Cover Sheet" is Granted. The Clerk is directed to issue a summons as to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint upon Defendants and forward it to Plaintiff along with blank U.S. Marshal Form 285s for each named Def endant. The Clerk is directed provide Plaintiff with a certified copy of the Courts Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP and a certified copy of his First Amended Complaint and the summons so that he may serve each named Defendant. The U.S. Marshal is ordered to serve a copy of the First Amended Complaint and summons upon the named Defendants as directed by Plaintiff. Defendants are ordered to reply to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 7/13/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Certified Copy to USM) (Certified documents mailed to Plaintiff. dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
