McKinley v. Miller et al
| Terry McKinley |
| Amy Miller, J. G. Janda, R. Premdas and B. Hugie |
| 3:2015cv00228 |
| February 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Luis Obispo |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
REPORT And Recommendation On Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment (ECF No. 149 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 10/11/2023.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(alns)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER granting 123 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Ryan Thomas Waggoner terminated; granting in part 124 Motion to Stay. Signed by District Judge William Q. Hayes on 9/30/2022. (anh)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting 56 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. This action will proceed on the only remaining count against the only remaining defendant, count two of the First Amended Complaint against Defendant B. Hugie. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 10/30/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mme)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation is Adopted with the exception of the recommendation to issue an order to show cause. (ECF No. 36 ). The motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Miller is Granted (ECF No. 33 ). It is further Ordered that Defendant Premdas is dismissed without prejudice at this stage in the proceedings for lack of service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The case proceeds as to the remaining Defendants in this action, Defendants Hugie and Janda. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 08/07/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs)
|
|
Filing
36
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for an Order (1) Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Claims Against Defendant Miller [ECF No. 33 ]; and (2) Issuing an Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Janda and Premdas Should Not Be Dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 5/21/2018. Replies due by 6/4/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 04/20/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ajs)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER (1) Denying Motion For Appointment of Counsel (Dkt # 24 ); And (2) Directing U.S. Marshal To Effect Service Upon Defendants. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/29/2017. (Per Order, IFP package prepared as to First Amended Complaint.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER (1) Granting Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) And (2) Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint For Failing To State A Claim: The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, shall collect from Plaintiff's prison trust account the $350 filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month's income and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordan ce with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Plaintiff is granted forty-five (45) days leave from the date of this Order in which to file a First Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Complaint within the time provided, this civil action shall remai n dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/5/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; per Order, a blank 1983 Complaint form also was mailed to Plaintiff; Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR; per Order, a copy of the Order was mailed to CDCR Secretary at the indicated mailing address.) (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
