Martin v. VA Regional San Diego Benefit Office, et al
David Jon Martin |
VA Regional San Diego Benefit Office, Gary Chesterton and Assistant Director |
3:2015cv00290 |
February 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
David H. Bartick |
Cynthia Bashant |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER granting Defendants' 29 Motion to Dismiss. Court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Pla's action and dismisses this action without prejudice in its entirety. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 10/5/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah) |
Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Court dismisses Pla's Complaint without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). If Pla wishes to proceed with this matter, he must submit an Amended Co mplaint by 4/27/2015. If Pla's amended complaint still fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, it will be dismissed with prejudice and without any further leave to amend. Court denies without prejudice Pla's 10 MOTION Directing US Marshal's to Serve Summons and Complaint in Defendants, because the motion is premature. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 3/26/2015. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.