Ravet v. Adkisson
| Ravet and Gary K. Ravet |
| Adkisson and Jay D. Adkisson |
| 3:2015cv00330 |
| February 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 lb |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER Granting #5 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/10/2015. (jao)
|
| Filing 10 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Janis L. Sammartino : Status Hearing re Plaintiff Ravet's recent death held; defense counsel to prepare motion to dismiss (Court Reporter/ECR Gayle Wakefield / CRD A Ramos / Defendant Attorney Christopher Lawrence Pitet) (no document attached) (acr) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: (1) Vacating Hearing and Briefing Schedule; (2) Setting Status Hearing. In light of the death of Plaintiff Gary K. Ravet, the Court, on its own motion, hereby vacates the hearing presently scheduled on Defendant's Special Motion to Strike or in the Alternative to Dismiss and for Change of Venue for April 9, 2015 at 1:30 pm; and hereby vacates the briefing schedule set for Defendant's Motion. The Court also hereby sets a status hearing for this case on July 9, 2015 at 1:30 pm. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/16/2015.(jao)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Jay D. Adkisson of death of Plaintiff (Pitet, Christopher) (jao). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim : A hearing on the Motion is presently scheduled for April 9, 2015. Plaintiff shall file a response on or before March 12, 2015. Defendant shall file a reply, if any, on or before March 26, 2015. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 2/27/2015.(jao)
|
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE by Jay D. Adkisson re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(Pitet, Christopher) (jao). |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Jay D. Adkisson. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Jay D. Adkisson, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit 7)(Pitet, Christopher) (jao). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Jay D. Adkisson of consent to Magistrate (Pitet, Christopher) (jao). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Lawrence Pitet on behalf of Jay D. Adkisson (Pitet, Christopher)Attorney Christopher Lawrence Pitet added to party Jay D. Adkisson(pty:dft) (jao). |
| Filing 2 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Jay D. Adkisson. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal, CORRECTED. (Attachments: #1 Notice Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint in Gary K. Ravet v. Jay Adkisson, Cal.Super.San Diego 37 -2015-00001861-CU-DF-NC, #3 Exhibit Declaration of Jay D. Adkisson)(Adkisson, Jay) (jao). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand From Superior Court, San Diego County, North Division, case number 37-2015-00001861-CU-DF-NC. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-7810793.), filed by Jay D. Adkisson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Jay D. Adkisson)The new case number is 3:15-cv-00330-JLS-MDD. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Adkisson, Jay)(fth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
