Lanier v. United States of America et al
Tommy Lanier |
United States of America, City of Chula Vista, Kean McAdam, Ralph Partridge and DOES 1 to 25 |
3:2015cv00360 |
February 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Cynthia Bashant |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Assault, Libel, and Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant City of Chula Vista's 53 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary judgment is granted in favor of the City on LaNier's Title VII retaliation claim and defamation claim. Summary judgment is denied on LaNier's FEHA retaliation claim. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 9/25/2017. (jah) |
Filing 73 ORDER granting Defendant Kean McAdam's 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. California's common interest privilege applies as a matter of law, and Defendant McAdam is entitled to summary judgment. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/14/2017. (jah) |
Filing 67 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 62 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and to Compel Discovery Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 3/10/2017. (jah) |
Filing 34 ORDER granting without leave to amend United States of America's 14 Motion to Dismiss; denying City of Chula Vista's 17 Motion to Dismiss. Court dismisses the Govt from the case with prejudice. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 2/16/2016. (jah). Modified on 2/16/2016 - Edited text. Regenerated NEF (jah). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.