Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Bear LLC et al
| Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London |
| Bear LLC and DOES 1 through 50 |
| 3:2015cv00630 |
| March 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX Outside US |
| David H. Bartick |
| John A. Houston |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
264
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Judgment 250 . Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/21/2018. (sjm)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Third-Party Defendant's 71 Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying 110 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 5/17/2017. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER Denying 69 Motion to Consolidate Cases without prejudice. The pretrial conferences shall be held at the same time. If the Court then determines that there is one or more common issues of fact that could be efficiently tried in a consolidated proceeding, the Court will give serious consideration to doing so. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/23/2016. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER Requiring In Camera Review of Word Document at Issue and Transmittal Email. (ECF No. 57 ). The documents may be hand delivered or email on or before 6/7/2016. The Court will then review the documents and issue an order resolving this dispute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 6/2/2016.(rlu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
