Lewis v. Cates et al
| Brian Deverick Lewis |
| Mathew Cates, Daniel Paramo, Alan Khan and A. Ojeda |
| 3:2015cv00791 |
| April 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Dana M. Sabraw |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER (1) Adopting 37 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and (2) Granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judges R&R, adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and grants Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 1/26/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|
|
Filing
37
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION on 27 Defendants E. Ojeda and D. Paramo's Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the District Court issue an Order: (1) Approving and Adopting this Report and Recommendation; and (2) GRANTING Defendants& #039; motion for summary judgment. Any written objections to this Report must be filed with the Court and served on all parties no later than January 3, 2018. Any reply to the objection shall be filed with the Court and served on all parties no later than January 10, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 12/18/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 22 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 7/6/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (fth)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court hereby approves and ADOPTS the R & R in its entirety (ECF 15 ), and GRANTS Respondents' motion to dismiss Claims One and Three. Plaintiff may amend Claim One if the amendment alleges a liberty interest in avoiding administrative segregation placement that imposes atypical and significant hardship upon Plaintiff. Plaintiff also may amend Claim Three to allege a denial of due process arising from Plaintiff's subsequent administrative segregation placement by Defendants Cates and Paramo. The Court dismisses Defendant Cates from this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 1/7/2016.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER (1) Granting Plaintiff's Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Re Doc. 2 ) And (2) Directing U.S. Marshal To Effect Service Of Summons And Complaint: The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from Plaintiff's prison t rust account the $350 filing fee owed in this case by garnishing monthly payments from his account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month's income forwarding those payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 6/8/2015. (IFP package prepared; Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR; Certified Copy to USM as part of IFP package.) (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
