Jones v. Vista Detention Facility et al
Michael Anthony Jones |
Vista Detention Facility and San Diego Sheriff Department |
3:2015cv00820 |
April 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Gonzalo P. Curiel |
Bernard G. Skomal |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER Granting 2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim: The Court directs the Watch Commander at the George Bailey Detention Facility, or his designee, to collect from Plaintiff 's trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case; Directs the Clerk of the Court to serve a copy of this Order on Watch Commander, George Bailey Detention Facility, 446 Alta Road, Suite 5300, San Diego, California 92 158; Dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint for failing to state a claim and and grants Plaintiff sixty days leave from the date of this Order in which to re-open this case by filing an Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading noted. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of a court approved civil rights complaint form. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 5/7/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Order sent to Watch Commander and civil rights complaint mailed to plaintiff. dlg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.