Saterbak v. National Default Servicing Corporation et al
| Laura D. Saterbak |
| National Default Servicing Corporation, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and DOES 1- XXX |
| 3:2015cv00956 |
| April 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
CLERK'S JUDGMENT: IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and National Default Servicing Corporation are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant J P Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Securitized Asset Management II, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice. The Motion for Order is denied as moot. The Motion for Entry ofDefault is denied. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER: The motion to dismiss the first amended complaint filed by Defendant SAMI is granted. (Dkt # 56 ). Plaintiff's claims against Defendant SAMI are dismissed with prejudice. The Motion for Order (Dkt # 63 ) is denied as moot in light of the Court's instant Order. The Motion for Entry of Default (Dkt # 55 ) is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/19/2017. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER: The motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants SPS and NDSC (Dkt # 25 ) is granted. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants SPS and NDSC are dismissed with prejudice. The motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Chase (Dkt # 36 ) is granted. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Chase are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/22/2016. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER (Re Dkt # 8 ): Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint is granted in its entirety. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a motion to file a First Amended Complaint within thirty (30 ) days of the date this order is issued, accompanied by the proposed First Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff does not file a motion to file a First Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date this order is issued, the Clerk of Court will be ordered to close the case. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 10/1/2015. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
