Driscoll v. MetLife Insurance et al
| Brian Joseph Driscoll |
| MetLife Insurance, Anheuser-Busch Inc. and John Doe (s) |
| 3:2015cv01162 |
| May 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Insurance |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1362 E.R.I.S.A.: Liability for Termination of Single Employer Plans |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
174
ORDER Dismissing Action With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Jinsook Ohta on 6/9/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(axc)
|
|
Filing
145
AMENDED ORDER RE JUDICIAL RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 10/8/21.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sxa)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo for all further proceedings. The new case number is 15-cv-01162-CAB-LL. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 10/7/21.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sxa)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER (1) Recusing from Case and (2) Requesting Reassignment. Judge Janis L. Sammartino is no longer assigned to the case. This case is reassigned to District Judge William Q. Hayes for all further proceedings. The new case number is 15-cv-1162-WQH-LL. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/17/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER re: 115 Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 11/12/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER Granting 64 Motion to Reopen Case. The Court agrees and thus grants Plaintiff's Motion only insofar as it seeks to reopen the case. For this reason the Court denies as moot Plaintiff's simultaneously filed Requests for Judici al Notice. As for briefing on the merits, the parties shall meet and confer regarding a briefing schedule for cross motions and submit to the Court an agreed-upon briefing schedule, if possible, on or before fourteen (14) days from the date on w hich this Order is electronically docketed. Thereafter the Court will set a briefing schedule to assess the merits of Plaintiff's claims that Defendant MetLife failed to conduct a full and fair review of Plaintiff's appeal. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 6/8/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
