Tuck v. Guardian Protection Services, Inc. et al
| Clarice Tuck |
| Guardian Protection Services, Inc., Charles D. Scholz and Does 1-25 |
| 3:2015cv01376 |
| June 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jill L. Burkhardt |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 39 Motion to Strike. It is ordered that the Court grants defendant's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 39) the following portions of plaintiff's TAC: (1) Paragraph 11, including accompanying Exhibits B and C; and (2) all references to 15 U.S.C. § 1692, including those in Paragraphs 1, 17, 18, and 23. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/20/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Specifically, the Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's second, third, fourth, fifth, seventh, and ninth causes of action and dismisses with prejudice Pl aintiff's sixth and eighth causes of action. Plaintiff may file a third amended complaint (TAC) within thirty (30) days of the date on which this Order is electronically docketed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/8/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kcm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
