Westfall v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
| Kathy Westfall |
| Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Bank of America, National Association, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Nationstar Mortgage Servicing and Does 1 through 200 |
| 3:2015cv01403 |
| June 25, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Karen S. Crawford |
| M. James Lorenz |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER Denying 90 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for TRO and Request for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 2/8/2019. (acc)
|
|
Filing
682
ORDER Dismissing Action for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Granting Plaintiff Leave to Amend. This action is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants' motion for judgment on the ple adings is denied as moot. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1653, Plaintiff is granted leave to amend to allege a basis for diversity jurisdiction. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, she must do so no later than 1/15/2019. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 12/27/2018.(lrf)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 9/29/2017. (sjt)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss and Granting Leave to Amend. No later than April 29, 2016, Plaintiff may file and serve an amended complaint, if any. Defendants response, if any, shall be filed and served no later th an the time specified in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3). If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint as provided herein, Defendants answer, if any, shall be filed and served no later than May 13, 2016. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 3/30/2016. (sjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
