Basham v. Midland Funding, LLC et al
| Angela Basham |
| Midland Funding LLC, Gamache & Myers, P.C. and Midland Credit Management Inc |
| 3:2015cv01479 |
| July 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER DISMISSING Duplicative Member Case. To resolve the administrative error of maintaining two MDL member cases for the same underlying action, the Court DISMISSES member case 15-cv-1479-MMA (MDD) without prejudice and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to close that case. Subsequent to the issuance of this order, no further documents will be accepted for filing in member case 15-cv-1479-MMA (MDD). Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 11/20/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER Denying 52 Plaintiff Basham's Motion to add Exhibits, for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, and to Remand Case to Transferor Court. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/30/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER Striking Plaintiff Basham's Discovery Request [ECF No. 48 ]. The Court DENIES Plaintiff Basham's motion and Orders that Plaintiff's First Set of MDL Discovery Requests be STRICKEN from the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 6/24/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 41 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 12/20/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule and Denying in Part Plaintiff Basham's Objection to Transfer and Motion to Compel Discovery. (ECF No. 41 ) The Court DENIES AS PREMATURE Plaintiff's request to opt-out of a class. The Court construes Plainti ff's motion to compel as a dispute regarding the sufficiency of Defendants' production of Plaintiff-specific information (see ECF No. 608 at 4) and production of information relating to Defendants' dialing technology and practices (id. at 5-6). Accordingly, Defendants' must file a response in opposition to Plaintiff's motion, if any, on or before December 20, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 12/11/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
