Foley v. Oceanside Police Department et al
| Gregory D. Foley |
| Oceanside Police Department and City of Oceanside, CA |
| 3:2015cv01627 |
| July 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court: (1) Adopts the Report in full; (2) Rejects Plaintiff's objections; (3) And Grants the motionto dismiss With Prejudice. Judgment shall be entered for defendants. It Is So Ordered. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)
|
|
Filing
107
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to Grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 102 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 1/8/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER Adopting 79 Report and Recommendation and Providing Plaintiff with Specific Instructions Regarding Further Proceedings. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 3/13/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jjg)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER, CASE TRANSFERRED to Southern District of CA, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 07/19/2015. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S) [Transferred from California Eastern on 7/22/2015.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
