Huynh v. Lizarraga
Petitioner: Philong Huynh
Respondent: J. Lizarraga
Case Number: 3:2015cv01924
Filed: August 31, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: David H. Bartick
Presiding Judge: Barry Ted Moskowitz
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER Denying Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Issuing a Limited Certificate of Applicability. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 3/19/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sxa)
May 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 65 Discovery Motion and Requiring Plaintiff to Show Cause. The Court Orders Huynh to show cause by 6/27/2017, why his petition should not be dismissed as untimely. Respondent must file any response by 7/11/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 5/31/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
August 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER Denying Petitioner's 32 Motion for Appointment of Counsel without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 8/5/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
May 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER: (1) Declining to Adopt the Findings and conclusions of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 20 ); (2) Denying Petitioner's Motion for Stay (ECF No. 7 ); and (3) Denying Petitioner's Conditional Request for Dismissal of Claim Two (ECF No. 24 ). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 5/23/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
March 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of United States Magistrate Judge regarding Petitioner's 7 MOTION for Stay and Abeyance filed by Philong Huynh. It is Ordered that no later than 3/25/2016, any party to this action may file written objections wi th the Court. It is further Ordered any Reply to the Objections shall be filed with the Court and served on all parties no later than ten (10) days from service of the filed Objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 3/1/2016.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Huynh v. Lizarraga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Philong Huynh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J. Lizarraga
Represented By: Attorney General
Represented By: Jennifer Anne Jadovitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?