Mouwakeh v. San Diego, County of et al
Bana Mouwakeh |
San Diego, County of, Bill Gore, Steven Dunning, Augustin Rosas, JR., Yvan Rogers and Does 1-10 |
3:2015cv02372 |
October 10, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Karen S. Crawford |
Thomas J. Whelan |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER (1) Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendants' Motion To Dismiss (Dkt # 22 ); And (2) Sua Sponte Striking Reference To Conspiracy In Paragraph 49 Of The Second Amended Complaint (Dkt # 21 ): Plaintiff will have leave to amend the SAC. Plaintiff must file an amended pleading, if at all, by 12/6/2016. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 11/22/2016. (mdc) |
Filing 20 ORDER (1) Granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion to Dismiss; and (2) Denying Defendants' Motion to Strike. Specifically, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's fourth and sixth causes of action is granted with leave to amend. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's third and fifth causes of action is denied. Plaintiffs will have leave to amend the FAC. Plaintiffs must file an amended pleading, if at all, by Monday, August 1, 2016. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 7/15/2016. (jao) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.