Duran v. Mandujano et al
| David B. Duran |
| Omar Mandujano and Alfredo Hernandez |
| 3:2015cv02745 |
| December 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Riverside |
| William V. Gallo |
| Dana M. Sabraw |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER (1) Adopting 104 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and (2) Granting 91 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judges R&R and the objections thereto, adopts the Mag istrate Judge's recommendation and GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Court finds no basis for a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 10/11/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|
|
Filing
104
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for Order Granting 91 Motion to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED and Plaintiff's FAC be DISMISSED with PREJUDICE. No later than September 29, 2 017, any party to this action may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. No replies to objections will be accepted, and the motion will be deemed taken under submission on September 29, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 8/31/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|
|
Filing
102
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for Order Granting Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED and that defendants Mandujano, A. Hernandez, L. Hernandez, and Seaman be DISMISSED with prejudice. No later than September 20, 2017, any party to this action may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. No replies to objections will be accepted. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 8/22/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER (1) Adopting Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and (2) Granting 41 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's R&R and the objections thereto, adopts the Magistrate Judge 's recommendation and grants Defendant's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") that cures the pleading deficiencies identified in the R&R. The SAC shall be filed on or before March 31, 2017. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 3/1/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Denying 30 Motion to Appoint Counsel without Prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 7/27/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
