Brooke v. Thomas Chen & Associates
| Theresa Brooke |
| Thomas Chen & Associates and Thomas Chen & Associates A Limited Partnership doing business as Days Inn San Diego Airport Convention Center/Harbor View |
| 3:2015cv02861 |
| December 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Ruben B Brooks |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Theresa Brooke (Strojnik, Peter)(jao). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Settlement by Theresa Brooke (Strojnik, Peter) (jao). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Theresa Brooke. Thomas Chen & Associates served. (Strojnik, Peter )(jao). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (fth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Thomas Chen & Associates ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-8659546.), filed by Theresa Brooke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:15-cv-2861-W-RBB. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case. (Strojnik, Peter)(fth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
