Dugas v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: |
Paul Dugas |
Defendant: |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., HST Lessee San Diego, LP and HST GP San Diego, LLC |
Case Number: |
3:2016cv00014 |
Filed: |
January 5, 2016 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Office: |
San Diego Office |
County: |
San Diego |
Presiding Judge: |
Gonzalo P. Curiel |
Presiding Judge: |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Personal Property Damage |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1453 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
June 28, 2017 |
Filing
54
ORDER Dismissing Second Amended Complaint. The Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice. See John Birch Soc'y v. Nat'l Broad. Co., 377 F.2d 194, 198 (2d Cir. 1967) (finding discretion not abused in dismissing case where the court point ed out pleading errors related to subject matter jurisdiction which were ignored). Plaintiff has 14 days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies identified by this Order, that makes a plausible showing tha t CAFA's jurisdictional threshold has been met, and that permits the Court to assess whether CAFA's mandatory "local controversy" exception applies. The Court warns that failure to do so will result in a final Order dismissing thi s civil action either for want of CAFA jurisdiction or for failure to prosecute in compliance with a Court order requiring amendment. See Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164, 1169 (9th Cir. 2005) ("If a plaintiff does not take advantage of the opportunity to fix his complaint, a district court may convert the dismissal of the complaint into dismissal of the entire action."). Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 6/28/2017. (acc)
|
November 3, 2016 |
Filing
28
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' 22 Motion to Dismiss. The Court grants Plaintiff twenty days from the issuance of this Order to file a Second Amended Complaint. Failure to meet the twenty-day deadline to file an amended complaint or failure to cure the deficiencies identified in this Order will result in a dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 11/3/16. (dlg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?