Brooke v. Shri Radha Govind, Inc.
| Brooke and Theresa Brooke |
| Shri Radha Govind, Inc. and Shri Radha Govind, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Comfort Suites Oceanside Marina |
| 3:2016cv00072 |
| January 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
ORDER re Stipulation for Dismissal (ECF No. #26 ). It is hereby Ordered that this case is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/26/2016. (rlu) (sjt).
|
| Filing 27 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford: On 8/25/2016 the parties filed a Joint Motion for Dismissal. [Doc. No. 26.] Consequently, the Settlement Disposition Conference is hereby VACATED. (no document attached) (jmw) |
| Filing 26 Joint MOTION for Settlement Motion for, MOTION Dismissal of Case 16-cv-00072-BTM-KSC by Shri Radha Govind, Inc.. (Rothman, Larry) (kcm). |
| Filing 25 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford: On 7/8/2016 plaintiff filed a Notice of Settlement. [Doc. No. 24.] Accordingly, the 7/29/2016 Status conference was vacated. A telephonic Settlement Disposition Conference has been set for 8/26/2016 at 9:45 A.M. Plaintiff shall initiate the conference by calling the Chambers of the Honorable Karen S. Crawford at the appointed time with all parties already on the line. The Status Conference will be vacated if the parties file the appropriate dismissal papers before 8/26/2016. (no document attached) (jmw) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Settlement by Theresa Brooke (Strojnik, Peter) qc email re lacking pos on 7/11/2016 (rlu). |
| Filing 23 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford: An Early Neutral Evaluation Conference (ENE) was held on 6/27/2016. The case did not settle at the ENE. A telephonic Status Conference has been set for 7/29/2016 at 9:30 A.M. Plaintiff shall initiate the conference by calling the Chambers of the Honorable Karen S. Crawford at the appointed time with all parties already on the line. The Status Conference will be vacated if the parties file the appropriate dismissal papers before 7/29/2016. (no document attached) (jmw) Modified on 7/7/2016 to correct date hearing held(jer). |
| Filing 22 NOTICE Report to court Concerning Meeting at Defendant's Hotel by Shri Radha Govind, Inc. (Rothman, Larry) (rlu). |
| Filing 21 STATUS REPORT RE: MEETING AT DEFENDANT'S HOTEL by Shri Radha Govind, Inc.. (Rothman, Larry) (rlu). |
|
Filing 20
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford Rejecting re #19 MOTION to Continue MEETING AND JOINT REPORT DATES, from Defendant Shri Radha Govind, Inc. Non-compliance with local rule(s), ECF 2(h): Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature, CIVLR 5.1(e): Except where compliance is impracticable, exhibits must be paged in consecutive numerical order and each page must show the exhibit number either immediately above or below the page number. CIVLR 5.1(j)(4): The following information must appear on the cover page of each motion, and any opposition and reply, in the space opposite the caption below the case number: name of judicial officer, courtroom number and the date and time of hearing. OTHER: The Document is non-justiciable as it does not seek or request action from the Court. OTHER: The Document contains the signature block for the District Judge, however the Magistrate Judge issued the underlying scheduling Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties.(rlu) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/13/2016: #1 Rejected Document) (rlu).
|
| Filing 19 ***STRICKEN PER #20 Order*** MOTION to Continue MEETING AND JOINT REPORT DATES by Shri Radha Govind, Inc.. (Rothman, Larry) prepared proposed discrepancy on 6/13/2016 (rlu). (Main Document 19 replaced on 6/13/2016) (rlu). Modified on 6/13/2016 to strike (rlu). |
|
Filing 18
NOTICE AND ORDER Setting Telephonic Early Neutral Evaluation Conference with counsel only. Telephonic Early Neutral Evaluation, with counsel only, set for 6/27/2016 at 2:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford. No later than 6/20/2016, counsel for all parties shall lodge with Magistrate Judge Crawford's chambers a joint statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 5/19/2016.(rlu) (Main Document 18 replaced on 5/20/2016) (rlu).
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT by Shri Radha Govind, Inc. re #7 MOTION to Quash - Defendant Shri Radha Govind, Inc.'s Notice of Motion & Motion to Quash Service of Summons of Plaintiff Theresa Brooke's A.D.A. Action for Insufficient Service of Process - With Exhibits and Declaration of Service - (Rothman, Larry) (rlu). |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Shri Radha Govind, Inc..(Rothman, Larry) (rlu). |
| Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER, Motions Submitted #7 MOTION to Quash - Defendant Shri Radha Govind, Inc.'s Notice of Motion & Motion to Quash Service of Summons of Plaintiff Theresa Brooke's A.D.A. Action for Insufficient Service of Process - With Exhibits and Declaration of Service - (no document attached) (rfm) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER Setting Aside Default (ECF No. #13 ). The Court Directs the Clerk to set aside the default. Furthermore, the Court Orders that Defendant shall respond to the Complaint within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 5/4/2016. (rlu)
|
| Filing 13 Joint MOTION to Set Aside Default - Stipulation to Set Aside the Default and Proposed Order With Declaration of Service - by Shri Radha Govind, Inc.. (Rothman, Larry) (rlu). |
| Filing 12 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford: A status conference was held on 4/29/2016. Peter Strojnik appeared for plaintiff and Larry Rothman appeared for defendant. The Court discussed the default judgment and the pending Motion to Quash before the Court. The parties agreed to file a Joint Motion to set aside the default judgment. Mr. Rothman stated he would then file an Answer to the Complaint within 10 days of the default being set aside. Mr. Rothman additionally stated he would be withdrawing the Motion to Quash. (no document attached) (jmw) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Quash - Defendant Shri Radha Govind, Inc.'s Notice of Motion & Motion to Quash Service of Summons of Plaintiff Theresa Brooke's A.D.A. Action for Insufficient Service of Process - With Exhibits and Declaration of Service - filed by Theresa Brooke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Strojnik, Peter) (rlu). |
| Filing 10 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford: A telephonic counsel only Status Conference has been scheduled for 4/29/2016 at 9:30 A.M. Plaintiff shall initiate the conference by calling the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford at the appointed time with all parties already on the line. (no document attached) (jmw) |
| Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford: On 4/6/2016, plaintiff filed a Motion for Settlement Disposition Conference. [Doc. No. 8.] The Court will not set a Settlement Disposition Conference in this case until a JOINT Notice of Settlement, signed by both parties, is filed with the Court. Therefore, plaintiff's Motion is DENIED. [Doc. No. 8.] However, a Status Conference will be set via separate minute entry. (no document attached) (jmw) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Settlement Disposition Conference by Theresa Brooke Notice of Defendant's Renege of Settlement and Request for Settlement Disposition Conference (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Strojnik, Peter) modified event type on 4/7/2016 (rlu). |
| Filing 7 ***WITHDRAWN PER #17 Notice of Withdrawal*** MOTION to Quash - Defendant Shri Radha Govind, Inc.'s Notice of Motion & Motion to Quash Service of Summons of Plaintiff Theresa Brooke's A.D.A. Action for Insufficient Service of Process - With Exhibits and Declaration of Service - by Shri Radha Govind, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C & Declaration of Service)(Rothman, Larry)Attorney Larry Rothman added to party Shri Radha Govind, Inc.(pty:dft)(rlu). Modified on 5/19/2016 to withdraw (rlu). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Theresa Brooke (Strojnik, Peter) (rlu). |
| Filing 5 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Shri Radha Govind, Inc. (rlu) Per #14 Order Setting Aside Default on 5/5/2016 (rlu). |
| Filing 4 Request for Entry of Clerk Default against Shri Radha Govind Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Strojnik, Peter) (rlu). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Theresa Brooke. Shri Radha Govind, Inc. served. (Strojnik, Peter) (rlu). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (nbp)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Shri Radha Govind, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-8707253), filed by Theresa Brooke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:16-cv-00072-BTM-KSC. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Strojnik, Peter)(nbp)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
