Reyes v. Brown et al
Plaintiff: Pedro Reyes
Defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Rogelio Ortega and Ray Madden
Case Number: 3:2016cv00084
Filed: January 11, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Imperial
Presiding Judge: Barbara Lynn Major
Presiding Judge: Janis L. Sammartino
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER: Overruling Plaintiff's objections; (2) Adopting 93 Report and Recommendation; and (3) Dismissing Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint without leave to amend. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/22/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
September 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 93 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Granting Defendants' 90 , 91 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim for Which Relieve May Be Granted. Any written objections to this Report must be filed with the Court and served on all parties on or before October 29, 2018. Any reply to the objections shall be filed with this Court and served on all parties on or before November 12, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 9/25/18.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
April 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER: (1) Adopting 76 Report and Recommendation; (2) Dismissing Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint: and (3) Denying as Moot Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/23/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
December 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 76 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for Order Granting 70 Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim for Relief Which May Be Granted. Order Granting (1) Plaintiff's Request for Additional Ti me to File a Third Amended Complaint, (2) Granting Plaintiff's Request for a Copy of the Local Rules, and (3) Clarifying the Status of the Pleadings. Objections to R&R due by 1/19/2018. Replies due by 2/9/2018. On or before 1/19/2018, Plaintiff may file a TAC. Defendants may challenge Plaintiff's TAC on or before 2/9/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 12/13/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service, copy of Local Rules mailed to Plaintiff)(rmc)
July 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER: (1) Adopting 57 Report and Recommendation; and (2) Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint. The Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 39 and 53 ) Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/10/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (fth)
April 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 57 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION For Order Granting Defendants Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint For Failure to State A Claim For Which Relief May Be Granted re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Raymond Madden, Rogelio Ortega, 53 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Beltran, Raymond Madden, Rogelio Ortega. It is ordered that any written objections to this Report must be filed with the Court and serv ed on all parties no later than 5/2/2017. Any reply to the objections shall be filed with this Court and served on all parties no later than 5/23/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 4/4/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
November 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER denying 48 Request to Appoint Counsel and Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 11/30/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kcm)
August 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER denying 32 Plaintiff's Second Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Because Plaintiff has not alleged the requisite "exceptional circumstances" at this time, the Court denies without prejudice Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 8/8/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kcm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reyes v. Brown et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pedro Reyes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rogelio Ortega
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray Madden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?