Carucel Investments, L.P. v. Novatel Wireless, Inc. et al
| Carucel Investments, L.P. |
| Novatel Wireless Inc, AT&T Mobility LLC and Verizon Communications Inc. |
| Harry R. Schafer |
| 3:2016cv00118 |
| January 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Karen S. Crawford |
| Marilyn L. Huff |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
368
ORDER Granting Defendants' 364 Motion to Retax Costs. In addition to the $42,152.20 in costs taxed by the Clerk of Court in its 9/1/2017 Order Taxing Costs, the Court also taxes $11,924 for costs associated with Defendants' el ectronic production of documents and an additional $18,050 for costs associated with Defendants' preparation of graphics and visual aids for trial. In sum, the Court awards a total of $72,136.20 in costs in favor of Defendants. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 10/17/2017. (ag)
|
|
Filing
305
ORDER: (1) Granting in Part and Denying in Part 163 , 210 Plaintiff's Daubert Motions; (2) Denying without Prejudice 154 , 207 Defendants' Daubert Motions; (3) Denying without Prejudice 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 Plaintiff's Motions in Limine; and (4) Granting in Part and Denying in Part 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 287 Defendants' Motions in Limine. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 4/3/2017. (aef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
