Leonard Saldana v. Neil McDowell

Leonard Saldana v. Neil McDowell

Plaintiff:	Leonard Saldana
Defendant:	Neil McDowell
Case Number:	3:2016cv00161
Filed:	January 22, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Barbara Lynn Major
Presiding Judge:	Janis L. Sammartino
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 9, 2017	Filing 34 ORDER Denying Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/9/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj) (sjt).
March 7, 2017	Filing 32 ORDER (1) Overruling Petitioner's Objections to Report And Recommendation; (2) 20 Adopting Report and Recommendation In Its Entirety ; And (3) Dismissing Petitioner's Petition Due To Untimeliness 13 . It is ordered that after review ing Petitioner's Opposition to the underlying Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 19), Judge Major's thorough Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 20), and Petitioner's Objections to Judge Major's Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 29) , the Court agrees with Judge Major's conclusion that the Petition is time barred. Accordingly, the Court overrules petitioner's objections, adopts Judge Major's Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and grants with prejudice respondent's Motion to Dismiss. This concludes the litigation in this matter. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/7/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj) (sjt).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 9, 2017

Filing 34 ORDER Denying Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/9/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj) (sjt).

March 7, 2017

Filing 32 ORDER (1) Overruling Petitioner's Objections to Report And Recommendation; (2) 20 Adopting Report and Recommendation In Its Entirety ; And (3) Dismissing Petitioner's Petition Due To Untimeliness 13 . It is ordered that after review ing Petitioner's Opposition to the underlying Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 19), Judge Major's thorough Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 20), and Petitioner's Objections to Judge Major's Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 29) , the Court agrees with Judge Major's conclusion that the Petition is time barred. Accordingly, the Court overrules petitioner's objections, adopts Judge Major's Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and grants with prejudice respondent's Motion to Dismiss. This concludes the litigation in this matter. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/7/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leonard Saldana v. Neil McDowell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leonard Saldana
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Neil McDowell
Represented By:	Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?