Krejci v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District Krejci v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC

Krejci v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC

Plaintiff:	Kevin Krejci
Defendant:	Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Case Number:	3:2016cv00211
Filed:	January 27, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Bernardino
Presiding Judge:	William V. Gallo
Presiding Judge:	John A. Houston
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	47 U.S.C. § 0227
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 28, 2020	Filing 70 ORDER on Joint Motion to Continue Deadline to File Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement and Vacating Status Conference. (ECF No. 66 ) Having reviewed and considered the Parties' supplemental briefing, the Court finds that good cause supports the Joint Motion and thus GRANTS the Motion in its entirety. Accordingly, the Parties are ORDERED to file, no later than February 21, 2020, their Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement. The Court underscores the importanc e of and necessity to meet this deadline, as the Court will not entertain any additional continuance requests absent a clear showing of good cause. To that end, the Court hereby VACATES the January 29, 2020 telephonic status conference, as the need for the conference has been obviated by the Court's instant ruling. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 1/28/2020. (tcf)
July 23, 2018	Filing 61 ORDER granting 53 Defendant's Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 7/17/2018. (jpp)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 28, 2020

Filing 70 ORDER on Joint Motion to Continue Deadline to File Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement and Vacating Status Conference. (ECF No. 66 ) Having reviewed and considered the Parties' supplemental briefing, the Court finds that good cause supports the Joint Motion and thus GRANTS the Motion in its entirety. Accordingly, the Parties are ORDERED to file, no later than February 21, 2020, their Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement. The Court underscores the importanc e of and necessity to meet this deadline, as the Court will not entertain any additional continuance requests absent a clear showing of good cause. To that end, the Court hereby VACATES the January 29, 2020 telephonic status conference, as the need for the conference has been obviated by the Court's instant ruling. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 1/28/2020. (tcf)

July 23, 2018

Filing 61 ORDER granting 53 Defendant's Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 7/17/2018. (jpp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Krejci v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Krejci
Represented By:	Trinette Gragirena Kent
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?