White v. Sohn et al
| White and Dorothy White |
| Sohn, David Chan Sohn and Jung Soo Sohn |
| 3:2016cv00285 |
| February 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| David H Bartick |
| M James Lorenz |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #17 Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 7/28/2016. (sjt) (jao).
|
|
Filing 18
Minute Order: The parties have submitted a joint motion for dismissal. Therefore, the Settlement Disposition Conference set for July 26, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 7/25/2016. (no document attached) (cxe)
|
| Filing 17 Joint MOTION to Dismiss by Dorothy White. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Hubbard, Scottlynn) (sjt). |
|
Filing 16
Order Scheduling Settlement Disposition Conference. Joint Motion for Dismissal due: 7/25/2016. If a Joint Motion for Dismissal and Proposed Order for Dismissal are not submitted by 7/25/2016, then a Settlement Disposition Conference shall be held. Settlement Disposition Conference set for 7/26/2016 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 7/15/2016.(sjt)
|
| Filing 15 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick: Early Neutral Evaluation Conference held on 6/15/2016. Case settled. Order to follow. (Plaintiff Attorney Khushpret Mehton). (Defendant Attorney Jacques Sapier). (no document attached) (cxe) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER Converting Early Neutral Evaluation into a Telephonic ENE. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 6/14/2016.(sjt)
|
|
Filing 13
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick Rejecting re #12 Administrative Record,, from Defendant David Chan Sohn. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Pursuant to the Courts order setting the Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) Conference, all ENE statements shall be lodged with Magistrate Judge David H. Barticks chambers. All ENE statements shall be emailed to: efile_Bartick@casd.uscourts.gov. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 5/19/2016.(sjt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/19/2016: #1 Rejected Document) (sjt).
|
| Filing 12 **DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER #13 ** ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD Early Neutral Evaluation Statement. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Sapier, Jacques) (QC mailer sent re: document to be lodged, not filed. Atty instructed to withdraw) (sjt). (Main Document 12 replaced on 5/19/2016) (sjt). Modified to Strike on 5/19/2016 (sjt). |
|
Filing 11
NOTICE AND ORDER to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation Conference to 6/15/2016 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 5/6/2016.(sjt)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 6/3/2016 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 4/1/2016.(sjt)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Jung Soo Sohn. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Sapier, Jacques) (sjt). |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by David Chan Sohn. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Sapier, Jacques) (sjt). |
|
Filing 7
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge M. James Lorenz Rejecting re #6 Answer to Complaint, #5 Answer to Complaint,, from Defendants David Chan Sohn, Jung Soo Sohn. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L Rule 5.2 and ECF 2(d): No proof of service. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/1/2016.(sjt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/1/2016: #1 Rejected Document #5, #2 Rejected Document #6) (sjt).
|
| Filing 6 **DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER #7 ** ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Jung Soo Sohn.(Sapier, Jacques)Attorney Jacques Sapier added to party Jung Soo Sohn(pty:dft) (sjt). (Main Document 6 replaced on 4/1/2016) (sjt). Modified to strike on 4/1/2016 (sjt). |
| Filing 5 **DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER #7 ** ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by David Chan Sohn.(Sapier, Jacques)Attorney Jacques Sapier added to party David Chan Sohn(pty:dft) (sjt). (Main Document 5 replaced on 4/1/2016) (sjt). Modified to Strike on 4/1/2016 (sjt). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dorothy White. David Chan Sohn served. (Hubbard, Scottlynn) (sjt). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dorothy White. Jung Soo Sohn served. (Hubbard, Scottlynn) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (fth) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-8768705.), filed by Dorothy White. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:16-cv-285-L-DHB. Judge M. James Lorenz and Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick are assigned to the case. (Hubbard, Scottlynn)(fth) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
