Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. DOE-70.181.229.254

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. DOE-70.181.229.254

Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. DOE-70.181.229.254

Plaintiff:	Dallas Buyers Club, LLC
Defendant:	DOE-70.181.229.254
Case Number:	3:2016cv00317
Filed:	February 8, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	David H. Bartick
Presiding Judge:	Cynthia Bashant
Nature of Suit:	Copyrights
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 0101
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 15, 2016	Filing 11 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 10 Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Conduct a Deposition by Written Questions Under FRCP 31. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 7/15/2016. (jah)
February 22, 2016	Filing 7 ORDER granting Plaintiff's 3 Ex Parte Motion to Expedite Discovery. Pla may serve a subpoena on Dft's ISP, Cox Communications, seeking the name and address of the subscriber assigned to Dft's IP address. Cox Communications shall hav e 14 calendar days after service of the subpoena to notify the subscriber that his or her identity has been subpoenaed. Subscriber shall have 30 calendar days from the date of the notice to seek a protective order or file any other responsive pleading. Pla shall serve a copy of this Order with any subpoena obtained and served pursuant to this Order to Cox Communications. No other discovery is authorized at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 2/22/2016. (jah)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 15, 2016

Filing 11 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 10 Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Conduct a Deposition by Written Questions Under FRCP 31. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 7/15/2016. (jah)

February 22, 2016

Filing 7 ORDER granting Plaintiff's 3 Ex Parte Motion to Expedite Discovery. Pla may serve a subpoena on Dft's ISP, Cox Communications, seeking the name and address of the subscriber assigned to Dft's IP address. Cox Communications shall hav e 14 calendar days after service of the subpoena to notify the subscriber that his or her identity has been subpoenaed. Subscriber shall have 30 calendar days from the date of the notice to seek a protective order or file any other responsive pleading. Pla shall serve a copy of this Order with any subpoena obtained and served pursuant to this Order to Cox Communications. No other discovery is authorized at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 2/22/2016. (jah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. DOE-70.181.229.254
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dallas Buyers Club, LLC
Represented By:	James Stephen Davis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: DOE-70.181.229.254
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?