Remund v. Zamudio et al
Eugene M. Remund |
Fernando Zamudio, R. Holt and Jane and John Does I through X |
3:2016cv00426 |
February 17, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Ruben B. Brooks |
John A. Houston |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER Responding to 31 Referral Notice. As such, Plaintiff-Appellant's IFP status is REVOKED, and the Clerk of Court is directed to notify the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of this order, pursuant to Appellate Court's referral notice. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 9/1/2017. (USCA Case Number 17-56231. Order electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr) |
Filing 25 ORDER adopting 24 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and dismissing Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint with prejudice 10 as to all Defendants. Singed by Judge John A. Houston on 7/20/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) (sjt). |
Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 16 Motion to Dismiss. Upon being served with a copy of this report, the parties have 14 days to file any objections. Upon being served with any objections, the party receiving such objections has 14 days to file any response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 5/31/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.