Velazquez et al v. International Marine and Industrial Applicators, LLC et al
| Hector Velazquez, Humberto Lopez and ROES 1-50 |
| International Marine and Industrial Applicators, LLC and DOES 1-50 |
| 3:2016cv00494 |
| February 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court grants Plaintiffs' motions and finds the proposed settlement of this class action appropriate for final approval pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e). The Court fin ds that the proposed settlement appears to be the product of serious, informed, arms-length negotiations, and that the settlement was entered into in good faith, and that Plaintiffs have satisfied the standards for final approval of a class action Se ttlement under federal law. Further, the Court finds the Settlement Administration fees and costs in the amount $15,212 are reasonable. The Court also finds Plaintiffs' request for an award of attorneys' fees in the amount of 25% of the common fund, or $15,250, and the requested costs in the amount of $2,500, are reasonable. Finally, the Court finds the class representative enhancement awards of $1,000 to Plaintiff Lopez and $500 to Plaintiff Garcia are reasonable.(rmc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
