Skyline Wesleyan Church v. California Department of Managed Health Care et al
| Skyline Wesleyan Church |
| California Department of Managed Health Care and Michelle Rouillard |
| 3:2016cv00501 |
| February 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| David H. Bartick |
| Marilyn L. Huff |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1988 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Plaintiff's claims are Dismissed Without Prejudice. It Is So Ordered. (jjg)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER: (1) Regarding Joint Motions for Determination of Discovery Dispute (ECF Nos. 47 , 55 ); and (2) Granting Motion to File Documents Under Seal (ECF No 56 ). The Court ORDERS as follows: Plaintiff's motion to compel production of the docu ments listed in the excerpted Third Amended Privilege Log is DENIED. However, Defendants shall lodge documents bates-stamped PRIV006037-6083, PRIV002949, PRIV002950-2995, and PRIV004196-4242 with the Court no later than September 26, 2017 for in came ra review, so that the Court may engage in a balancing analysis to determine whether the Official Information Privilege applies. Defendants Motion to Seal (ECF No. 56) is GRANTED. Accordingly, the documents lodged at ECF No. 57 shall be filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 9/22/2017. (aef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
