Rocha v. McDowell

Rocha v. McDowell

Petitioner:	Juan Rocha
Respondent:	Neil McDowell
Case Number:	3:2016cv00606
Filed:	March 10, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	Riverside
Presiding Judge:	Gonzalo P. Curiel
Presiding Judge:	Nita L. Stormes
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 13, 2017	Filing 31 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation 24 ; Granting Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Petition 20 ; Granting Motion to Hold Federal Habeas Petition in Abeyance 14 ; and Denying as Moot Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Additional Briefing 30 . Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/13/17. (dlg)
March 11, 2016	Filing 3 Order Requiring Response to Petition. Respondent must file a Notice of Appearance no later than March 30, 2016. Respondent must file a motion to dismiss Cases no later than May 16, 2016. If Respondent files a motion to dismiss, Petitioner must fi le his opposition, if any, to the motion no later than June 16, 2016. OR, Respondent must file and serve an answer to the Petition no later than May 16, 2016. Petitioner may file a traverse to matters raised in the answer no later than June 16, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 3/11/16.Documents sent to Attorney General.(dlg)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 13, 2017

Filing 31 ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation 24 ; Granting Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Petition 20 ; Granting Motion to Hold Federal Habeas Petition in Abeyance 14 ; and Denying as Moot Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Additional Briefing 30 . Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/13/17. (dlg)

March 11, 2016

Filing 3 Order Requiring Response to Petition. Respondent must file a Notice of Appearance no later than March 30, 2016. Respondent must file a motion to dismiss Cases no later than May 16, 2016. If Respondent files a motion to dismiss, Petitioner must fi le his opposition, if any, to the motion no later than June 16, 2016. OR, Respondent must file and serve an answer to the Petition no later than May 16, 2016. Petitioner may file a traverse to matters raised in the answer no later than June 16, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 3/11/16.Documents sent to Attorney General.(dlg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rocha v. McDowell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan Rocha
Represented By:	Charles R. Khoury, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Neil McDowell
Represented By:	Attorney General
Represented By:	Vincent Paul LaPietra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?