Miran v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.,

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District Miran v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.,

Miran v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.,

Plaintiff:	Dara Miran
Defendant:	Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2016cv00692
Filed:	March 22, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Jan M. Adler
Presiding Judge:	Anthony J. Battaglia
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 20, 2017	Filing 33 ORDER granting 26 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has fourteen (14) days to submit a second amended complaint correcting the deficiencies noted herein. Failure to do so will result in the Court's dismissing this case without leave and closing the file. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 4/20/2017. (acc)
December 13, 2016	Filing 24 ORDER denying 16 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED and Convergent's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. Plaint iff must file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of and in accordance with this Order. Convergent will then have thirty (30) days from the filing of the amended complaint to answer or otherwise respond. If Plaintiff fails to amend within the time provided, the Court will enter a dismissal with prejudice of this action. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 12/13/2016. (acc)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 20, 2017

Filing 33 ORDER granting 26 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has fourteen (14) days to submit a second amended complaint correcting the deficiencies noted herein. Failure to do so will result in the Court's dismissing this case without leave and closing the file. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 4/20/2017. (acc)

December 13, 2016

Filing 24 ORDER denying 16 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED and Convergent's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. Plaint iff must file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of and in accordance with this Order. Convergent will then have thirty (30) days from the filing of the amended complaint to answer or otherwise respond. If Plaintiff fails to amend within the time provided, the Court will enter a dismissal with prejudice of this action. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 12/13/2016. (acc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miran v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.,
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dara Miran
Represented By:	Jared M. Hartman
Represented By:	Asil Mashiri
Represented By:	Babak Semnar
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?