Embotteladora Electropura S.A. de C.V. v. Accutek Packaging Equipment Company, Inc. et al
Embotteladora Electropura S.A. de C.V. |
Accutek Packaging Equipment Company, Inc. and Does 1 through 25 |
3:2016cv00724 |
March 25, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
XX Outside US |
David H. Bartick |
Gonzalo P. Curiel |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 175 ORDER Denying Joint Motion to Strike Jury Verdict and Granting Joint Motion to Dismiss Case With Prejudice ( 170 , 173 , 147 ). Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/23/20. (dlg) |
Filing 166 ORDER Granting Defendant's Renewed 158 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 4/23/20. (dlg) |
Filing 157 AMENDED ORDER: (1) Denying Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; (2) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for New Trial; and (3) Striking the Declarations of Todd Peters and Omotunde Ogungbe (ECF Nos. [111 ], 130 ). The Court further instructs the parties to schedule and attend a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Berg following the entry of this order to discuss the possibility of a settlement on the remaining claim for punitive damages. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 2/13/20.(dlg) |
Filing 141 ORDER Denying Defendant's 111 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's 130 Motion for New Trial; and Striking the Declarations of Todd Peters and Omotunde Ogungbe. The Court further instructs the parties to schedule and attend a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Berg following the entry of this order to discuss the possibility of a settlement on the remaining claim for punitive damages. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 7/24/19. (dlg) |
Filing 54 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Denying 52 Joint MOTION for Discovery (Determination of Dispute) filed by Accutek Packaging Equipment Company, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block on 4/10/18.(dlg) |
Filing 45 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Ex Parte 41 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint, Reopen Discovery, and Continuance of Pretrial Conference; and Granting Plaintiff's 42 Motion to File Documents Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 2/13/18. (dlg) |
Filing 37 ORDER Re: 33 Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 2/16/2018. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 2/23/2018 at 01:30 p.m. before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 09/15/2017. (ajs) |
Filing 36 ORDER Granting in Part 26 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court grants Defendant's motion as to Plaintiff's fourth through seventh contract- based causes of action, but denies Defendant's motion as to Plaintiff's first through third causes of action, which are grounded in fraud and misrepresentation. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/2/17. (dlg) |
Filing 29 ORDER Imposing Monetary Sanctions. The Court orders Plaintiff to compensate Defendant's counsel for the costs incurred in connection with the discovery motion and declaration. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 5/3/17.(dlg) |
Filing 27 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 22 Defendant Accutek's Ex Parte Motion for Determination Discovery Dispute. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 5/1/17. (dlg) |
Filing 14 ORDER Denying Defendant's 3 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/15/16. (dlg) (dlg). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.