Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. et al v. Kamala D. Harris
||Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. and Prime Healthcare Foundation, Inc.
||Kamala D Harris
||April 1, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of California
||San Diego Office
||XX US, Outside State
||Jill L. Burkhardt
||John A. Houston
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 16, 2017
ORDER Denying 62 Defendants' Motion to Strike and Granting 62 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The Court DENIES Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiffs' quid pro quo allegations and GRANTS Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' SAC. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/16/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|October 31, 2016
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 50 Motion to Strike. The Court DENIES Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' FAC pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) (Dkt. No. 49.); GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice Plaintiffs' FAC pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) as to Plaintiffs' first, third, fourth, and fifth claims for relief (Dkt. No. 49); GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss without prejudice Plaintiffs' FAC pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) as to Plaintiffs' second claim for relief only (Dkt. No. 49); and DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application to Strike New Arguments and Evidence in Defendant's Reply Brief (Dkt. No. 50). Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/31/2016. (acc)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?