Thompson v. Paramo et al
Leroy Thompson |
Daniel Paramo, James Walker, Kyle Werner Seeley and Luzyiminda Saidro |
3:2016cv00951 |
April 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Michael M. Anello |
Bernard G. Skomal |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. The Court grants Defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismisses this action with prejudice.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) |
Filing 56 ORDER Denying 55 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court is mindful of Plaintiff's claimed medical issues. However, Plaintiff's situation does not rise to the "exceptional circumstances" warranting appointment of counsel. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 12/18/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) |
Filing 45 ORDER Denying 34 , 36 Motions to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 9/13/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) |
Filing 18 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 3/29/2017. (cc: USMS) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.