Hartman v. Costa Verde Center et al
| Rita Hartman |
| Costa Verde Center, Regency Centers Property Management, San Diego Medical Transport and DOES 1-10 |
| 3:2016cv00956 |
| April 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jill L. Burkhardt |
| Jeffrey T. Miller |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER Granting 50 Motion to Dismiss. The court grants the motion to dismiss the ADA, DPA, and Unruh Act claims. This action shall proceed against SDMT on the negligence claim only. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 12/8/2016. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER Granting Motion to Amend Notice of Removal; Denying Motion to Dismiss; Granting Motion to Set Aside Default; Denying Ex Parte Application to Intervene; Denying Motion to Intervene. The court concludes that by Granting the motion to set aside d efault, the ex parte motion to intervene (Ct. Dkt. 24 ) and the motion to intervene (Ct. Dkt. 30 ) are Denied as moot. The court Grants the motion to file an amended Notice of Removal; Denies the motion to dismiss, Grants the motion to se aside default; Denies the ex parte application to intervene; and Denies the motion to intervene. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 9/14/2016. (rlu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
