Merrill et al v. Mental Health Systems et al
| David Merrill, Kiet Le and Benjamin Hill |
| Mental Health Systems, The Training Center, Jean R. Almonor and DOES 1 through 50 |
| 3:2016cv01090 |
| May 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Gonzalo P. Curiel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 cv Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER: Granting Plaintiffs' 30 Motion to Remand; Dismissing All Other Pending Motions Without Prejudice As To Their Reassertion in State Court 31 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, 35 Motion to Dismiss, 35 Motion to Strike, 36 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 12/16/2016. (Certified copy of order was sent to State Superior Court). (dxj)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Granting in Part and Deferring in Part Defendants Mental Health Systems and the Training Center's 16 , 17 Motions to Dismiss and Granting Plaintiffs Leave to Amend and Leave to Conduct Limited Jurisdictional Discovery. The Court (1 ) GRANTS Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' 1983 claim, (2) GRANTS Plaintiffs leave to amend their 1983 claim, (3) GRANTS Plaintiffs leave to conduct limited discovery, and (4) DEFERS ruling on Defendants' motions to dismiss and motions to strike Plaintiffs' remaining state law claims. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/13/16. (dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
