Benhoff v. United States Department of Justice et al
Plaintiff: Thomas Michael Benhoff
Defendant: United States Department of Justice, Laura E. Duffy and Kyle W. Hoffman
Case Number: 3:2016cv01095
Filed: May 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Jill L. Burkhardt
Presiding Judge: Gonzalo P. Curiel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0551
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Granting Defendants' 20 Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying 22 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The hearing set for March 10, 2017 shall be vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/3/17. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
November 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' 10 Motion to Dismiss. The Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss the FOIA cause of action and grants Defendants' motion to dismiss the Assistant U.S. Attorney and denies Defendants' motion to dismiss the U.S. Attorney. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 11/29/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
June 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service. The Court directs: the Watch Commander, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the acc ount exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2); and the Clerk to issue a summons as to Plaintiffs Complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 6/14/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Certified Copy to USM) (IFP package prepared and certified copies sent to Plaintiff. dlg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benhoff v. United States Department of Justice et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Michael Benhoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Justice
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laura E. Duffy
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kyle W. Hoffman
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?