Coyle v. Clear Channel Communications et al
| Justin Coyle |
| Clear Channel Communications, MTV and Associated Production Co., San Diego City Fire Dept., Hollywood Production Co.s, Sony Records, Private Illegal Individuals, Cult of Sex Stalkers, Joint Agency EPA, K9 and IRS of CA |
| 3:2016cv01173 |
| May 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Karen S. Crawford |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER denying as moot 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissing civil action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and without leave to amend. The Court certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would also be frivolous and therefore, could not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 10/4/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kas)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failing to pay filing fee. Plaintiff is granted forty-five days leave from the date this Order is filed to re-open this case by prepaying the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee or filing a motion to proceed ifp. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 5/19/16 (motion for ifp to plaintiff)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
