Spayd v. Colvin

Spayd v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Aaron Spayd
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	3:2016cv01353
Filed:	June 3, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Jill L. Burkhardt
Presiding Judge:	Janis L. Sammartino
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 0405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 14, 2017	Filing 22 ORDER: (1) Adopting Report and Recommendation; (2) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; (3) Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and (4) Remanding Case to Social Security Administration. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/14/2017. (mpl)
July 27, 2017	Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 18 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Aaron Spayd. It is ordered that any written objections to this Report and Recommend ation must be filed with the Court and served on all parties no later than 8/10/2017. The document should be captioned "Objections to Report and Recommendation." It is further ordered that any reply to the objections shall be file d with the Court and served on all parties no later than 8/17/2017. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to raise those objections on appeal of the Court's order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 7/27/2017.(dxj)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 14, 2017

Filing 22 ORDER: (1) Adopting Report and Recommendation; (2) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; (3) Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and (4) Remanding Case to Social Security Administration. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/14/2017. (mpl)

July 27, 2017

Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 18 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Aaron Spayd. It is ordered that any written objections to this Report and Recommend ation must be filed with the Court and served on all parties no later than 8/10/2017. The document should be captioned "Objections to Report and Recommendation." It is further ordered that any reply to the objections shall be file d with the Court and served on all parties no later than 8/17/2017. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to raise those objections on appeal of the Court's order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 7/27/2017.(dxj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spayd v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron Spayd
Represented By:	Lawrence D Rohlfing
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	U S Attorney CV(Designation Assistant United States Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?