Hart v. Larson et al
| Hoyt Hart |
| Scott R. Larson, Scott R. Larson, P.C. and DOES 1 through 10 |
| 3:2016cv01460 |
| June 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
ORDER Denying 147 Plaintiff's Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 12/5/2019. (mme)
|
|
Filing
156
ORDER: (1) Denying Motion to Strike, [Doc. 148 ]; (1) Granting Motion for Extension of Time, [Doc. 151 ]. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 10/2/2019. (tcf)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER on Plaintiff's Motions In Limine [Docs. No. 86 and 87 ]. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 12/17/2018. (anh)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER on 69 MOTION for Order Determining Applicable State Law. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 8/24/2018. (anh)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 47 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 6/15/18. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Denying 32 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 10/2/2017. (knb)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER: (1) Denying Defendants' 6 Special Motion to Strike (Anti-SLAPP); (2) Denying Defendants' 7 Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings; and (3) Granting Plaintiff's 24 Motion to Amend. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 2/3/2017. (knb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
