Ewing v. Integrity Capital Solutions, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: |
Anton Ewing |
Defendant: |
Integrity Capital Solutions, Inc., Harvey Scholl, Michele Sharpe, DOES 1-100, ABC Corporations 1-100 and XYZ, LLC 1-100 |
Case Number: |
3:2016cv01469 |
Filed: |
June 14, 2016 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Office: |
San Diego Office |
County: |
San Diego |
Presiding Judge: |
Mitchell D. Dembin |
Presiding Judge: |
Janis L. Sammartino |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Statutory Actions |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
October 10, 2018 |
Filing
64
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Defendant Harvey Scholl's Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing [ECF No. 56 ]. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/10/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
August 6, 2018 |
Filing
53
ORDER granting 47 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Deposition. Plaintiffs motion to compel is GRANTED. Defendant Sharpe must appear for deposition at a date, time and place to be agreed upon by the parties no later than two weeks from the date of this Order, absent a contrary agreement of the parties. Any dispute regarding the document production requested with the deposition notice, must be filed within 30 days in accordance with this Courts Civil Chambers Rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 8/6/18. (Dembin, Mitchell)
|
July 11, 2017 |
Filing
27
ORDER Granting in Part Defendants' 22 Motion to Dismiss and 24 Motion to Dismiss. It is ordered that the Court grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss only insofar as it applies to Plaintiff's RICO cause of action. However, P laintiff's Complaint comes demonstrably closer to alleging a plausible RICO claim than his previous attempt. Accordingly, the Court grants plaintiff leave to amend his Complaint in regards to his RICO cause of action. Any such amendment mu st be within fourteen days of the date on which this Order is electronically docketed. If Plaintiff elects not to amend his Complaint, the case shall proceed to discovery on Plaintiffs other causes of actions. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/11/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
|
February 27, 2017 |
Filing
19
ORDER Granting Defendant's 3 Motion to Dismiss. It is ordered that the Court grants defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's RICO cause of action. Plaintiff's RICO claim is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff id granted leave to amend his complaint. Any such amendment must be within 21 days from the date on which this Order is electronically docketed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 2/27/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?