Ewing v. Integrity Capital Solutions, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Anton Ewing
Defendant: Integrity Capital Solutions, Inc., Harvey Scholl, Michele Sharpe, DOES 1-100, ABC Corporations 1-100 and XYZ, LLC 1-100
Case Number: 3:2016cv01469
Filed: June 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Mitchell D. Dembin
Presiding Judge: Janis L. Sammartino
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Defendant Harvey Scholl's Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing [ECF No. 56 ]. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/10/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER granting 47 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Deposition. Plaintiffs motion to compel is GRANTED. Defendant Sharpe must appear for deposition at a date, time and place to be agreed upon by the parties no later than two weeks from the date of this Order, absent a contrary agreement of the parties. Any dispute regarding the document production requested with the deposition notice, must be filed within 30 days in accordance with this Courts Civil Chambers Rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 8/6/18. (Dembin, Mitchell)
July 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Granting in Part Defendants' 22 Motion to Dismiss and 24 Motion to Dismiss. It is ordered that the Court grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss only insofar as it applies to Plaintiff's RICO cause of action. However, P laintiff's Complaint comes demonstrably closer to alleging a plausible RICO claim than his previous attempt. Accordingly, the Court grants plaintiff leave to amend his Complaint in regards to his RICO cause of action. Any such amendment mu st be within fourteen days of the date on which this Order is electronically docketed. If Plaintiff elects not to amend his Complaint, the case shall proceed to discovery on Plaintiffs other causes of actions. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/11/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
February 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER Granting Defendant's 3 Motion to Dismiss. It is ordered that the Court grants defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's RICO cause of action. Plaintiff's RICO claim is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff id granted leave to amend his complaint. Any such amendment must be within 21 days from the date on which this Order is electronically docketed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 2/27/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ewing v. Integrity Capital Solutions, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anton Ewing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Integrity Capital Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda Faye Riley
Represented By: Andrew M Steinheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harvey Scholl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michele Sharpe
Represented By: Amanda Faye Riley
Represented By: Andrew M Steinheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABC Corporations 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XYZ, LLC 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?