Corona v. Azul Vista, LLC et al
| Arlene Corona |
| Azul Vista, LLC, Michael J. Martinez, Does 1-100, ABC Corporations 1-100 and XYZ, LLC's 1-100 |
| 3:2016cv01594 |
| June 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John A. Houston |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER Granting 4 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is GRANTED. 1. Plaintiff's Civil RICO claim brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq. is DI SMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, as to both Defendants; 2. Plaintiff's federal TCPA claim, and supplemental state law claims alleged against Defendant Michael J. Martinez are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2. Plaintiff is GRANTED fourteen (14) days leave t o file an Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading described in this Order. Plaintiff is cautioned, however, that should she choose to file an Amended Complaint, it must be complete by itself, comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Rule 8(a), and that any claim not re-alleged will be considered waived. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 3/31/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
