Muse v. Garcia Castillo et al
| Eric James Muse |
| Ernie Garcia Castillo and Latosha White |
| 3:2016cv01722 |
| July 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| John A. Houston |
| Peter C. Lewis |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Watch Commander of the South Bay Detention Facility, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1). The Court grants Plaintiff forty-five (45) d ays leave in which to file an Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies of pleading described in this Order. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 7/14/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cc: Watch Commander, South Bay Detention Facility)(kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
