Lundin v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Lundin and Christofer Lundin |
| Ford Motor Company and Does 1-30 |
| 3:2016cv01822 |
| July 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M Anello |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford:On December 6, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. [Doc. No. 10.] As a result, the telephonic Status Conference set for December 9, 2016 is hereby taken off calendar. IT IS SO ORDERED. (no document attached) (asm) |
| Filing 11 Minute Order Re #10 Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii): Based on the parties' compliance with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), no court order is required. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case. (no document attached) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Christofer Lundin Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Klitzke, Michael) (ag). |
Filing 9
Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford:A telephonic Status Conference was held on 11/18/2016. A follow up telephonic Status Conference has been set for 12/9/2016 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the telephonic conference by calling Judge Crawford's Chambers at the appointed time with all counsel on the line. (no document attached) (asm)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christofer Lundin. Ford Motor Company served. (Le Pere, Jeffrey) (fth). |
|
Filing 7
Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford:Early Neutral Evaluation Conference held on 9/14/2016. The parties resolved the matter. A telephonic Status Conference has been set for 11/18/2016 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the telephonic conference by calling Judge Crawford's Chambers at the appointed time with all counsel on the line. (no document attached) (asm)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 9/14/2016 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 8/16/2016.(fth)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Ford Motor Company . Identifying Other Affiliate State Street Corporation for Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Rodriguez, Robert) (fth). |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Rodriguez, Robert)Attorney Robert C Rodriguez added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft) (fth). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (acc) (jao). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest. No Parties With Financial Interest. (acc) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-9238510.), filed by Christofer Lundin. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:16-cv-1822-MMA-KSC. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Klitzke, Michael)(acc) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
