Pan et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated et al
| Dandan Pan, Carrie Haluza, Carolina Dealy, Laura Paquin, Wei Shi, Blanche Matulich and Connie Jacobson |
| Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. |
| 3:2016cv01885 |
| July 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| David H. Bartick |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER Granting (1) Final Approval of Class and Collection Action Settlement re 20 Motion for Settlement and (2) 21 Motion for Attorney Fees, Costs, and service Awards. Granting 33 Motion to File Documents Under Seal. It is ordered that the Court grants in its entirety both Plaintiffs' Final Approval Motion and Attorney Fee Motion. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/31/2017. (dxj)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER Granting 44 Motion for Approval of Notice. The updated Notice complies with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the Court's prior Order. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiffs' Notice Motion. Additionally, Plaintiffs may notify the Court if all seven women waive their opportunities to opt out, object, or request a supplemental final fairness hearing. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/1/2017. (dxj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
